I wrote recently about
Cadbury's decision to stop using palm oil in its chocolate, and how people power had made a difference. Well, shoppers in Wellington may be congratulating themselves today, thinking they've won a similar victory against The Man. But this story is different - because what they've managed to do is manipulate two supermarkets into
stopping charging for plastic bags.
Yes, the people have spoken. And this time, what they said was, "I'm too lazy to make a change and I don't want to be forced to think about the environment."
Shoppers at Wellington's New World and Four Square supermarkets won't have to pay for bags any more, even though the rest of New Zealand does, because they got so vocal about the charge. I have to say I'm unimpressed that Foodstuffs (the owner of the chains) gave in so easily after making such a big hurrah about the new policy earlier this year.
Charging for bags has so far been a success, with participating supermarkets reducing bag use by 50 percent, or 40 million bags. And yet it seems commitment to the plan is already wavering.
We're supposed to be clean, green New Zealand, but other Western nations seem to be
way ahead of us when it comes to phasing out plastic bags.
Sure, plastic bags are convenient and lightweight and we're used to the supermarket providing them for us so we don't have to remember to bring our own. But they're also bad for the planet in pretty much every possible way. You'd think phasing them out would be a no-brainer, and not much of a big deal - after all, Pak n Save has always charged for bags (although that's a decision based on cost-cutting, rather than the environment) and you don't see people whinging about them.
But apparently some people are too set in their ways. They don't see why they should have to forgo the convenience just so everyone can benefit. And so they whinged, and threatened to boycott.
We're talking about five cents per bag here, people. Your bank account will barely notice the difference - and if it does, well, maybe it'll be the incentive you needed to join the people who do actually give a stuff about the environment, about our future and about something other than themselves.
And as a final note, speaking of thinking of others - today, September 1 is
Random Acts of Kindness Day. Have you done something nice for someone, or been the benefactor of an act of kindness? (Maybe you offered to pay for a disgruntled shopper's plastic bags?) Share your experience in the comments.
Comments
WORD! And BOO to Foodstuffs in Welllington. For those NW and 4 Squares in other regions ( I'm a checkout chick at one of them) - you go guys - we're making a difference.
Sep 1 05:22 pmTo stop the compulsory charge undermines all the work that we checkout staff at different stores have done in the last few weeks - all for the sake of a few whingers and moaners. So much for us being proud of NZ's 'clean green' image... It's simple really - you don't want to pay for bags - then bri
want to charge me for bags and I won't spend my money at your shop,I don't shop at the warehouse any more.I use the bags as rubbish bags/for oiling veges before roasting/for flouring meat and fish/as freezer bags,and many other uses in the kitchen.If I don't have any supermarket bags around then I use bags that contain lots more plastic than the super market bags
Sep 1 05:32 pm...bring your own.
Sep 1 05:37 pmI think its a rip off having to pay for plastic bags, dont we pay enough already now, Im the same as the above poster I dont shop at warehouse anymore, I went in there and got asked if I wanted a plastic bag and would be 10c a bag I said stick it and all the stuff with it, wont be coming back. just a money making rip off system. funny how we have to have plastic Rubbish Bags to put out on Road, whats the difference?
Sep 1 06:49 pmI am absolutely A-OK with the decision by the owners of these stores. A voluntary scheme is sure to be more successful in the long run both in terms of their business and in customer awareness. A pity other Supermarkets didn't take the same approach instead of unilaterally enforcing the ban. Imagine if those same stores were to say in 12 months, a charge will be made, but that will be offset by a reduction in prices within our Stores. Win:Win situation and wouldn't they gain customers.
Sep 1 07:47 pm