Patchy Arguments

By Ryan Angles | View Archive May 8th, 2009, 9:47 am
  • Send
  • Print
Wanganui seems to appear in the news more than any other New Zealand town. This could mean one of two things lots of terrible things happen there, OR Michael Laws' publicist is really pushing to get his face on screen a bit more. The May 7th edition of 3 News convinced me that the latter is the case.

Wanganui popped up into the news hour (again) with a report on the move to ban gang patches from being worn there. I've seen these stories before. They usually have a menacing soundtrack accompanying footage of colossal gang members sauntering through the streets and making rude hand gestures at the cameraman. This story was different though. It actually made reference to these conventions of previously aired Wanganui gang stories.

It also featured an interview with a woman who had lived in Wanganui her entire life, yet she had not seen a single patch-wearing gang member. Another man-on-the-street said that gangs didn't seem to be a problem either. But this was in stark contrast to the patch infested Wanganui that Mayor Michael Laws told us about. Wait a minute... Maybe Mayor Laws is talking about Wanganui and the others were in fact residents of Whanganui.

I kid. That's a whole different can of worms that I won't open here.

However, it was good to see that Wanganui was appearing in the news on this occasion for a different reason than a spelling debate. Yet the newsworthiness of this appearance was beginning to dissipate with the residents' testimony of a veritable gang drought.

But even if Mayor Laws is right, and gang members are prowling the streets of Wanganui 24/7, will the removal of their patches achieve anything? It seems Mr Laws thinks that the piece of material worn on the back of a gang member's jacket may hold mystical powers. Does he think that a law-abiding man becomes a senseless, criminal thug as soon as the patch is put on?

Of course I realise there is an argument that the patches are highly intimidating to non-gang affiliated members of the public. But let's be honest, if a gang member who wasn't wearing a patch approached me on the street, I would still be intimidated. They tend to ooze intimidation through their very being; the patch just informs me what his mascot is.

I guess that this particular 3 News report furthered my belief that this is a somewhat pointless issue. But perhaps that doesn't worry Michael Laws. Maybe it's just enough to be seen and heard discussing some 'serious issues' on a grown up television show like 'The News'.  Because let's face it, 'Dancing With the Stars' wasn't really the programme for that sort of carry on.

Comments

  1. nitespawn666 View Profile

    Gang members intimidating? When did this happen? The only intimidation gangs can muster is through a pack like mentality, 12 on 1 makes the 12 look very scary... Although, I can remember when I was 16 and walking upto a group of gang members and asking them (on a dare) "Do you guys take yourselves seriously? cause no-one else does"

    May 9 09:49 am
  2. harveyhayman View Profile

    Ryan you seem to have missed the angle. Yes of course gang members are intimidating with or without a patch. However, the true value of the patch comes from within the gang and the culture that exists there. New prospects will behave in violent irrational ways to earn the right to wear the patch, behaviour people like Micheal Laws would like discouraged. By removing patches is there not a chance we slowly devalue the symbol within its own culture. sorry I'm with Mr laws on this on one.

    May 9 11:49 am
  3. rickjs22 View Profile

    Hey, as a resident, I think the comment re Laws' publicist is right! And as to spelling - Michael knows the PROPER way to spell my town should be 'Lawsville'(as in the NZ equivalent of Smallville, home of the world's greatest hero! NOT!!)
    Patches? I'm already laughing at the guys with their little bandannas/hankies sticking out of their pockets to show 'where they're at' - thought that was part of gay culture?

    May 9 12:24 pm
  4. xtr240239 View Profile

    Ryan you are absolutly right. Wanganui or Whanganui; Gang Patches nno patches the only reason They are so much in NEWS is their mayor. Only other way they could get any publicity is Laws showng his.... People there are idiots for electing someone like Laws. If they have any sort of sense they will send him packing in disgrace (bottom of the list) next elections. Hopefully he will not do any more damages to the food people in Wanganui or Whanganui

    May 9 03:01 pm
  5. ducatti1 View Profile

    Michael Laws is an attention seeker!!
    I agree with Ryan, MLaws just wants to be a household name-wottaz!!

    May 9 05:36 pm

Post your comment

To post a new comment, you must Sign in first.

News Poll

Do you avoid companies that outsource their call-centre staff?

Do you avoid companies that outsource their call-centre staff?

Vote Now

Opinion

  • Amy Williams

    October 23, 2009, 12:49 pm
    Public-art players and pantsless plonkers

    As the long weekend beckons, it's time to take a light-hearted look at some of this week's quirkier news...

  • Ed's View

    November 11, 2009, 11:34 am
    Is Hone Harawira a racist?

    The Oxford Dictionary defines racism as "1. Belief in the superiority of a particular race; prejudice based on this. 2. Antagonism towards people of other races."Since his expletive laced email tirade Hone Harawira has been called many...

  • Ellie Evans

    November 20, 2009, 5:47 pm
    The most shocking of tales

    Several stories this week merit a special mention in my mind-boggling news blog, but this first one will take some beating. Or shocking.A police officer called to a house in an small Arkansas town saw fit to use his Taser on the house's unruly...

Yahoo!Xtra News Preferences

Close

Select your region to see news and weather for your area.