‘VIP-Lane’ Pandemic-Mask Supplier Embroiled in London Trial
(Bloomberg) -- A logistics firm which won over £1 billion ($1.3 billion) worth of UK government contracts during the pandemic is embroiled in a trial over whether it was justified in breaking off a contract with a supplier during the race to source medical equipment during the first wave of Covid-19.
Most Read from Bloomberg
China Attempts to End Property Crisis With Broad Rescue Package
With a BlackRock CEO, $9 Trillion Vanguard Braces for Turbulence
US Inflation Data Was Accidentally Released 30 Minutes Early
Putin and Xi Vow to Step Up Fight to Counter US ‘Containment’
Jamie Dimon Sees ‘Lot of Inflationary Forces in Front of Us’
Uniserve Ltd., the company owned by businessman Iain Liddell, walked away from a deal in June 2020 with a Jordanian supplier, to buy 80 million face masks after finding a cheaper Chinese supplier in June 2020, lawyers for Hitex, the Jordanian firm, told the UK High Court on Thursday. Hitex is seeking $23 million in compensation from Uniserve.
Uniserve denied the claim and alleged Hitex overstated their production capacity and delayed delivery of the masks. “I can’t put my name to this and they can’t produce so we have to cancel,” Liddell was quoted as saying in court documents.
The government, desperate for medical equipment at the start of the pandemic, handed contracts to firms with little experience in manufacturing or procuring them, which then rushed to meet the large demands. Almost 400 contracts worth £7.9 billion were handed to ‘VIP lane suppliers’ including Uniserve, according to UK’s National Audit Office.
Uniserve’s £70-million contract to supply 80 million face masks to the health department was part of over £1 billion worth of contracts it won. The company was referred by Theodore Agnew, then a minister of state at the cabinet office and the Treasury.
“Uniserve denies any liability,” its lawyers said. Uniserve terminated the contract in June, 2020 after Hitex failed to meet the delivery schedule for the masks, they said.
The Upminster, Essex-based shipping firm launched a counter claim and alleged it was induced to sign the contract based on deceit and misrepresentation about production capacity of Hitex.
Most Read from Bloomberg Businessweek
How the ‘Harvard of Trading’ Ruined Thousands of Young People’s Lives
Milei Targets Labor Law That’s Set to Hand Banker $10 Million Severance
©2024 Bloomberg L.P.